Abstract
Abstract The Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication, endorsed by the Committee on Fisheries of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations in 2014, heightened the recognition and protection of small-scale fisheries globally. The guidelines are voluntary and non-binding, but does this mean they have no normative significance or legal force? Based on international legal theories of soft law, this article explores the legal status of the guidelines and argues that the guidelines have normative significance and legal force for three main reasons: (i) the legitimate process of development and adoption of the guidelines; (ii) the normative content of the provisions; and (iii) their law-making effects at various levels of governance. The guidelines contribute to building a global safety net for small-scale fisheries, which should continue to improve and expand thus securing the sector’s sustainability worldwide.
Highlights
Small-Scale Fisheries (SSF) Guidelines – soft law – normative significance – legal force – legitimate process – normative content – law-making effect via free access
The SSF Guidelines contribute to the empowerment of a fisheries occupation and way of living, which sustain millions of livelihoods around the world
The SSF Guidelines spur the awareness of the global community and the fisheries sector to observe and implement the human rights-based approach (HRBA) and an ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF) in securing sustainable SSF
Summary
Small-Scale Fisheries (SSF) Guidelines – soft law – normative significance – legal force – legitimate process – normative content – law-making effect via free access.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
