Abstract
This study was conducted through the investigation and analysis of additional criminal reasons for rulgi can be applied as an ulpaya perlindungan victim of investment with a ponzi scheme. Also, reviewing and analyzing Hukum Perlindungan for Victims of Investigative Pellnipulan with Ponzi Skema. This research uses a Normative Juridical approach. While the penelitian that is carried out by pelnelliti is the case study (Casel Approach). The results of this study show two things, namely: 1) At present there are only a few regulations that more or less allude to the discussion of ponzi, including: Law No. 7 of 2014 concerning Trade, Law No. 21 of 2008 concerning Sharia Banking, Law No. 19 of 2016 Jo. Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions Government Regulation No. 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. Criminal provisions against investment activities with ponzi / fraudulent schemes are regulated in Article 378 of the Criminal Code and are very closely related to crime and the scope of criminal liability, 2) Compensation as one type of criminal sanction adopted in the new Criminal Code does not provide further explanation about the amount.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
