Abstract
Post-Global Financial Crisis, global law firms and in-house departments have started to take up ‘Legal Project Management’ (LPM). LPM adopts and adapts project management methods for the law context as a means of streamlining, planning and costing legal work. This article examines LPM as an aspiring driver of managerialist change within the legal profession. In its reframing of all legal matters as ‘projects’, LPM is also an example of a more specific type of managerialist change, ‘projectification’: the process by which work activities, and our activities generally, are being organised and shaped as projects or temporary endeavours. Though we know managerialism is occurring, our understanding of how it manifests in, and is promoted by, specific practices and discourses within the workplace organisation is under-developed in the law context. It may be tempting to read managerialism as sullying traditional professionalism. But an extensive body of literature has documented the interactions of professional and managerial imperatives that result in what has been described as a hybridisation of different logics or belief systems. This article adds vital detail to the existing literature about managerialism within the legal profession by looking closely at LPM as projectification. To do so, it utilises Mirko Noordegraaf’s three dimensions of professionalism that represent core points of distinction: coordination of work, authority or the grounds for legitimacy, and values at stake. Through these facets, it analyses LPM’s somewhat contradictory aspects, illustrating the schismatic nature of projectification as both exciting and empowering, and ethically risky and dehumanising.
Highlights
Legal practices are under immense pressure to prove their ‘value proposition’ within an increasingly competitive environment
Projectification is the process by which work activities, and our activities generally, are being organised and shaped as projects[5] or temporary endeavours[6] and temporary modes of organising.[7]. Both managerialism and projectification are technologies often used by leaders in organisations such as law firms to increase the use of other information technology and automated technologies
This article aims to introduce and contextualise Legal Project Management’ (LPM) as a new, ‘projectifying’ form of managerialism and examine its main features. It contributes to a core academic inquiry: what managerialism means for professionalism
Summary
Legal practices are under immense pressure to prove their ‘value proposition’ within an increasingly competitive environment. To examine LPM, we adopt Professor of Public Management,[26] Mirko Noordegraaf’s, three dimensions of professionalism that represent core distinctions: coordination of work, authority or the grounds for legitimacy, and the values at stake.[27] Through these facets, we analyse LPM’s somewhat contradictory aspects, illustrating the schismatic nature of projectification as both exciting and dynamic, and controlling and efficient. Besides accepted goals of managerialism such as efficiency and profit,[32] proponents of LPM advance LPM as a method to support satisfying working lives among lawyers They claim it fills certain gaps within traditional firms, including through its emphasis on thriving teams and mentoring, clear and effective delegation, reduced risks and associated stress, ethical billing practices and better relationships among colleagues and with the client.[33]. Reveals about managerialism within the profession and how projectification represents a new form of centralised control, and possibilities for teamwork and transparency
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
