Abstract
This paper aims to examine if the difference of legal traditions make different corporate governance regimes for protecting interest of listed family enterprises’ shareholders through evaluating and comparing corporate governance regimes in the Greater China region, including Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. The result is consistent with the LLSV paper, i.e. common law tradition constitute better corporate governance regime. We also find that countries with civil law traditions can be enhance the quality of the corporate governance regime through legal and financial reforms, and through adopting some measures which is commonly found in companies govern by common law tradition.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
