Abstract
The subject of the paper is theoretical justification of legal nature of positive constitutionalresponsibility legal institute. The evolution of views on the institution of positive constitutionalresponsibility from the first works on it (S.A. Avak`yan, Yu.P. Eremenko, F.M. Rudinsky, N.A. Bobrova) to the present time is analyzed.The purpose is to clarify its role in establishment and maintaining the regime of constitutionallegality.The results, scope of application. Doubts about the legal nature of positive constitutionalresponsibility up to its complete denial are identical with doubts about the legal nature ofmany constitutional norms, the denial of their direct action. These disputes will last forever.Direct service of constitutional and legal responsibility to the quality of governance is a featureof this type of legal responsibility along with its pronounced political character, as wellas the specific guilt of the subject of constitutional tort (liability not only for their acts butfor the acts of their subordinates).The emphasis on positive moral aspect to the detriment of "sanction" (retrospective) aspectof the constitutional responsibility does not meet the challenges of the new time.Proponents of affirmative responsibility had good purpose to build its high creative andeducational role from the positive side of the legal liability. However, this good purpose inpractice has not led to optimistic results.The authors come to the conclusion the legal regulation of mechanisms of responsibilityenforcement in Russia is necessary.
Highlights
Статья посвящена теоретическому обоснованию юридической природы института позитивной конституционной ответственности, ее роли в закреплении и поддержании режима конституционной законности
The purpose is to clarify its role in establishment and maintaining the regime of constitutional legality
Constitutional responsibility, responsibility up to its complete denial are identical with doubts about the legal nature of constitutional-legal responsibility, many constitutional norms, the denial of their direct action
Summary
Информация о статье Дата поступления – 26 июня 2017 г. Дата принятия в печать – 10 июля 2017 г. Дата онлайн-размещения – 30 сентября 2017 г. Ключевые слова Конституционная ответственность, конституционно-правовая ответственность, конституционное правоотношение, позитивная конституционная ответственность, юридическая природа, доктрина конституционализма. Статья посвящена теоретическому обоснованию юридической природы института позитивной конституционной ответственности, ее роли в закреплении и поддержании режима конституционной законности. Прослеживается эволюция взглядов на институт позитивной конституционной ответственности с первых работ о ней Сомнения в юридической природе позитивной конституционной ответственности вплоть до ее полного отрицания тождественны сомнениям в юридической природе многих конституционных норм, отрицанию их прямого действия. Сделан вывод о необходимости законодательного закрепления механизмов применения конституционной ответственности в России
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.