Abstract
Abstract This article addresses the legal models and methods used by the Western powers to colonise the South Pacific. It first focuses on the informal empire in the last third of the nineteenth century and up to World War I. This is the period in which control is gained by the Western powers but responsibility averted since in most cases sovereignty over the territories concerned is not yet acquired. The legal models established for gaining control – culminating notably in the creation of colonial protectorates and only later annexation – were to some extent the same as those established elsewhere in the globe. But the legal methods used by the British (for whom the Empire had become an ‘intolerable nuisance’) and to a lesser extent the United States (ideologically averse to colonisation) in order to establish initial control, stand out because of the way that each projected their municipal laws; in the case of the British with the humanitarian purpose of ending human trafficking. The second focus of this article is on the more innovative regimes used to colonise the Pacific island territories in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, more specifically those involving joint governance. The condominium emerges as a model of choice to manage disputes between the powers and its use was principally to address their geo-strategic concerns both in the region and globally. Entrenching earlier trends, a tradition of joint governance would later continue into the twentieth century with remarkable similarities to what preceded it. This article serves as a reminder of the subtle and complex ways in which the law can be instrumentalised to give effect to colonisation. It is timely given the increasing concern today over foreign interference in the South Pacific.
Highlights
This article addresses the legal models and methods used by the Western powers to colonise the South Pacific
From the late nineteenth century and well into the twentieth, Western powers imposed on the island territories of the South Pacific various systems of colonial governance, replaced in some cases in the twentieth century with internationalised care-taker models in the form of League of Nations Mandates and United Nations Trust Territories
A second nineteenth century legal method by which the powers exerted control without responsibility, and to which consular jurisdiction was generally the precursor, was the creation of international legal structures, such as protectorates, lease-like arrangements, or – a method favoured in the Pacific – condominiums
Summary
From the late nineteenth century and well into the twentieth, Western powers imposed on the island territories of the South Pacific various systems of colonial governance, replaced in some cases in the twentieth century with internationalised care-taker models in the form of League of Nations Mandates and United Nations Trust Territories. Joint governance in particular was frequent, something one might attribute to the perennial search in the South Pacific for economies of scale, but more often was a means for colonial powers to neutralise any rival’s preponderance of influence over a territory pending its ultimate division amongst themselves. As a collection these regimes have an intrinsic interest as they serve as models of how international law can be instrumentalised. Territorial control and later acquisition in the South Pacific was generally achieved so that Western powers might control their often unruly nationals located there; in order to liquidate their problems with other
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d’histoire du droit international
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.