Abstract

The dialectical relationship of formal and informal legal action in social reform politics has generally received less scholarly attention. Law is rarely an insular or discrete force in actual social practice, both for judges on the bench and citizens in the street; rather, it is usually only one contingent and interactive, if often important, dimension in the complex mix of factors that structure our choices and actions. It is this pluralistic and contingent character of legal conventions that renders them a dynamic but elusive force structuring social life. The legal mobilization approach emphasizes an understanding of law as identifiable traditions of symbolic practice. The legal mobilization approach urged here likewise gives considerable attention to the indirect—or, in Galanter's terminology, the centrifugal and radiating—effects of official legal action on social struggle. The most commonly acknowledged manifestation of legal mobilization in reform politics concerns its potential contribution to movement building.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.