Abstract
Introduction: This research contains a formulation of the problem, namely how the judge's legal interpretation of the deadline for imposing pretrial decisions is based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 66/PUU-XVI/2018. This research also aims to: analyze the interpretation of the law by judges regarding the deadline for imposing pretrial decisions based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 66/PUU-XVI/2018. Method: The research method used is normative legal research, with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, which are analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques. Result: This study also concluded that the judge's interpretation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 66/PUU-XVI/2018 contains 2 (two) substances, namely the value of legal certainty, and is based on the principle of a simple, fast, and low-cost trial. Conclusion: The Constitutional Court Decision Number 66/PUU-XVI/2018 rejected the Petitioner's request to examine the constitutionality of Article 82, paragraph (1) letters c and d of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
