Abstract
ABSTRACT In ‘From inconsistent obligations to the possibility of legal gluts’, Bradley Armour-Garb outlines the debate between Graham Priest and Jc Beall concerning the (possible) existence of legal gluts – i.e. the (possible) existence of true contradictions arising from laws or legal statutes. He argues that a qualified version of Priest’s positive position is more plausible than Beall’s negative one. In this paper, we offer some reasons to think otherwise.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
