Abstract
ABSTRACT In ‘From inconsistent obligations to the possibility of legal gluts’, Bradley Armour-Garb outlines the debate between Graham Priest and Jc Beall concerning the (possible) existence of legal gluts – i.e. the (possible) existence of true contradictions arising from laws or legal statutes. He argues that a qualified version of Priest’s positive position is more plausible than Beall’s negative one. In this paper, we offer some reasons to think otherwise.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
