Abstract
This research aims (1) To find out the legal consequences of limiting the subject of the mortgage provider for the enforcement of Article 9 paragraph (5) of the Regulation of the Minister of ATR / BPN Number 9 of 2019 concerning Electronic Mortgage Services. This study uses an Empirical juridical approach. This study concludes (1). The legal consequence of the limitation on the subject of the Granting of Mortgage Rights on the enforcement of Article 9 paragraph (5) of the Regulation of the Minister of ATR / BPN Number 9 of 2019 concerning Electronic Mortgage Services, namely the defective element of intention in APHT, the emergence of nominee agreements and PERMEN ATR / BPN No. 9/2019 contradicts the principle of lex superiori derogat legi inferiori Article 8 in conjunction with Article 4 paragraph (4) and paragraph (5) of the UUHT.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
