Abstract

The authors elaborate on one of the controversial issues of international air law - safety of civil aircraft in flight in respect of the use of weapons against it. The first part of the present article considers major aerial accidents arising from shooting down the civil aircraft for the last 70 years as a factual basis for further legal analysis. In the second part, the authors back up customary prohibition of the use of weapons against civil aircraft in flight and legal consequences for states for violating the mentioned principle. The authors investigate the grounds for the security exception and conclude that the only grounds for derogation from the principle of non-use of weapons against civil aircraft is Article 51 of the UN Charter proclaiming the inherent right of the state to self-defence. Even in this case, the application of the security exception by the state is tolerated by using a set of precautions before employment of weapons. Finally, authors conclude that compensation for victims reflects the inevitable monetisation of human lives. Moreover, states negotiations reveal the controversial reality of trade-offs between them, where compensation amounts are occasionally affected by external political factors and current position of a particular state in the international community.

Highlights

  • Civil aviation’s influence on the social and economic areas of our lives is increasingly active these days

  • The authors investigate the grounds for the ‘security exception’ and conclude that the only grounds for derogation from the principle of non-use of weapons against civil aircraft is Article 51 of the UN Charter proclaiming the inherent right of the state to self-defence

  • Throughout the history of aerial accidents, exceptions to the principle of non-use of weapons against civil aircraft have been repeatedly discussed both by the states that have shot down an aircraft and the victim states70

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Civil aviation’s influence on the social and economic areas of our lives is increasingly active these days. To date, aerial accidents arising from shooting down a civil aircraft by states continue to occur Such cases take place regardless of the out-right prohibition to use weapons against civil aircraft in flight. The key practical point of this article is substantiating the existing customary rule of international law that generally prohibits the use of weapons against civil aircraft in flight. This principle is regarded as a cornerstone of safety in civil aviation and as a primary precondition for its normal functioning

Case Study of Aerial Accidents
Article 3 bis of the Chicago Convention as a Treaty Law
Prohibition to Use Weapons Against Civil Aircraft as a Customary Law
Is There Any ‘Security Exception’ for Shooting Down Civil Aircraft?
Article 3 bis Obligations as a Ground for Exception
Exceptions Derived from Claims of States
Article 51 of the UN Charter as a Basis for Exception
Are there any alternatives for monetization of human lives?
The value of passengers’ lives — is there a standard?
Driving Force in case of Aerial Accident
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.