Abstract

ABSTRACT Amazonian peoples use and manage plant populations in previously domesticated landscapes, but the extent of landscape transformation remains uncertain, especially in interfluvial areas. We tested the hypothesis that useful plant communities vary in richness, abundance and basal area around pre-Columbian and current settlements independent of the distance to a major river. Nine plots were established at different distances from settlements in the Humaita National Forest and the Jiahui Indigenous Land, where trees and palms with DBH ≥ 10 cm were sampled. Interviews were used to identify species, their uses and management practices. We found high values of richness, abundance and basal area of useful species around settlements both close to and 70 km from the major river. Different use categories presented different responses to current management, which shows that management by current and past populations is selective. We showed that areas of intensive management and landscape transformation are not limited to the margins of major rivers, but also occur in interfluvial areas within a radius of 5 km from pre-Columbian and current settlements. Indigenous people and local communities manage forests around their settlements over time, showing that they are key actors in the sustainable use of Amazonia.

Highlights

  • Pre-Columbian Amazonian societies domesticated the landscapes around their homes and settlements in many ways and in different degrees to make them more productive and familiar (Clement et al 2015; Clement & Cassino 2018)

  • We found high values of richness, abundance and basal area of useful species around settlements both close to and 70 km from the major river

  • We showed that areas of intensive management and landscape transformation are not limited to the margins of major rivers, and occur in interfluvial areas within a radius of 5 km from pre-Columbian and current settlements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pre-Columbian Amazonian societies domesticated the landscapes around their homes and settlements in many ways and in different degrees to make them more productive and familiar (Clement et al 2015; Clement & Cassino 2018). Recent studies of the human transformation of Amazonian landscapes has questioned the existence of pristine landscapes (Denevan 1992; 2011; Clement et al 2015; Levis et al 2017); the heterogeneity of landscape domestication in different environments across Amazonia remains uncertain, especially with respect to areas far from the main rivers. This is because some scholars argue that areas intensely transformed by pre-Columbian peoples are limited to the margins of major rivers (Bush et al 2015; Piperno et al 2015). These margins impressed the first European explorers and were certainly important (Denevan 1996), but smaller tributaries were occupied, they are less studied (Levis et al 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call