Abstract

Background Left bundle branch block (LBBB) leads to dyssynchronous left ventricular (LV) contraction and relaxation which may contribute to LV dysfunction and ultimately heart failure. LBBB-related mechanical dyssynchrony often responds to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, this therapy is expensive and the number of non-responders remains significant. Reliable functional markers of dyssynchronous LV pumping that can predict response to CRT have proved elusive. Almost all studies of LV mechanical dyssynchrony focus on wall motion properties rather than aspects of intraventricular flow. 4D flow CMR specific measures have recently emerged as markers of LV function in failing hearts. Reduced volume and kinetic energy (KE) of the portion of LV inflow which passes directly to outflow (Direct Flow) has been demonstrated in failing LVs compared to normal LVs. In this study we hypothesized that the volume and KE of Direct Flow would be further reduced in myopathic LVs with LBBB compared to similarly dysfunctional and remodeled LVs without LBBB.

Highlights

  • Left bundle branch block (LBBB) leads to dyssynchronous left ventricular (LV) contraction and relaxation which may contribute to LV dysfunction and heart failure

  • In this study we hypothesized that the volume and kinetic energy (KE) of Direct Flow would be further reduced in myopathic LVs with LBBB compared to dysfunctional and remodeled LVs without LBBB

  • The volume of the Direct Flow component was not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.17), but the KE at end diastole was lower among patients with LBBB (P = 0.018, Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Open Access

Left ventricular kinetic energy as a marker of mechanical dyssynchrony in failing hearts with LBBB: a 4D flow CMR study. Jakub Zajac1*, Jonatan Eriksson, Petter Dyverfeldt, Urban Alehagen, Tino Ebbers, Ann Bolger, Carl Johan Carlhall. From 19th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions Los Angeles, CA, USA. From 19th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions Los Angeles, CA, USA. 27-30 January 2016

Background
Results
Methods
Direct flow Retained inflow Delayed ejection flow Residual volume
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.