Left ventricle function assessment using gated first-pass 18F-FDG PET: Validation against equilibrium radionuclide angiography

Abstract

PurposeWe appraised the feasibility of left ventricle (LV) function assessment using gated first-pass 18F-FDG PET, and assessed the concordance of the produced measurements with equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA). Materials and MethodsTwenty-four oncologic patients benefited from 99mTc-labeled red-blood-cell ERNA, in planar mode (all patients) and using SPECT (22 patients). All patients underwent gated first-pass 18F-FDG cardiac PET. Gated dynamic PET images were reconstructed over 1 minute during tracer first-pass inside the LV and post-processed using in-house software (TomPool). After re-orientation into cardiac canonical axes and adjustment of the valves plane using a phase image, pseudo-planar PET images obtained by re-projection were automatically segmented using thresholded region growing and gradient-based delineation to produce an LV ejection fraction (EF) estimate. PET images were also post-processed in fully-tomographic mode to produce LV end diastole volume (EDV), end systole volume (ESV), and EF estimates. Concordance was assessed using Lin’s concordance (ccc) and Bland-Altman analysis. Reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV) and intra-class correlation (ICC). ResultsPseudo-planar PET EF estimates were concordant with planar ERNA (ccc = 0.81, P < .001) with a bias of 0% (95% CI [− 2%; 3%], limits of agreement [− 11%; 12%]). Reproducibility was excellent and similar for both methods (CoV = 2 ± 1% and 3 ± 2%, P = NS; ICC = 0.97 and 0.92, for PET and ERNA, respectively). Measurements obtained in fully-tomographic mode were concordant with SPECT ERNA: ccc = 0.83 and bias = − 3 mL for LV EDV, ccc = 0.92 and bias = 0 mL for LV ESV, ccc = 0.89 and bias = − 1% for LV EF (all P values < .001 for ccc, all biases not significant). ConclusionsGated first-pass 18F-FDG PET might stand as a relevant alternative to ERNA for LV function assessment, enabling a joint evaluation of both therapeutic response and cardiac toxicity in oncologic patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy.