Abstract
IntroductionFew studies demonstrated that focal epilepsy (FE) with left hemispheric (LH) seizure onset is more frequent than with right hemispheric (RH) seizure onset. In addition, patients with LH seizure onset show worse clinical course compared to those with RH seizure onset. The aim of our study was to investigate both issues in a great cohort of FE patients. MethodsIn the retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical and paraclinical data of 682 patients with exclusively LH or RH seizure onset. We ascertained the laterality of seizure onset mainly by ictal and postictal semiology and ictal EEG findings. In the absence of ictal data, the basis of lateralization was the evidence of unilateral structural brain abnormality together with a corresponding interictal EEG finding. The endpoint of analysis of the clinical course was the presence/absence of five-year remission on drug treatment in the first ten years of treatment. ResultsOut of the 682 patients, 378 (55.4 per cent) had LH and 304 (44.6 per cent) had RH seizure onset. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.04). Out of them, 213 LH and 156 RH patients were eligible to evaluate prognosis. Five-years-remission was attained by 71 patients (33.3 per cent) in the LH, and 65 (41.7 per cent) in the RH group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.05). ConclusionWe demonstrated the LH dominance of seizure onset and the worse clinical course of the patients with LH seizure onset. The findings are manifestations of the lateralized epileptic propensity of the brain. The dissimilar clinical course of the patient with LH and RH seizure onset may shape the general prognostic scheme in FE patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.