Abstract

During rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), two streams of letters simultaneously presented in the left and right visual fields (LVF and RVF) evoke visual potentials (VEPs) of EEG a few milliseconds earlier at the right (RH) than the left hemisphere (LH). This small LH VEP lag might be attributed to a RH advantage in initial processing of rapidly changing stimuli or to larger load of the LH by its specialized processing of letters from both visual fields simultaneously. In the present study, the two-stream condition was compared in two experiments to conditions with smaller instantaneous verbal load, namely with stimuli presented either solely or slightly earlier in the LVF or RVF. The RH advantage hypothesis predicts a LH VEP lag very similar to the standard two-stream condition when comparing between LH and RH VEPs contralateral to the single or earlier stream. The LH load hypothesis predicts shorter VEP latencies at the LH in the one-stream and earlier-stream than in the two-stream condition, resulting in an absent LH lag in those conditions. Results tended to be more in line with these latter predictions suggesting that in RSVP the LH might be more involved in partial processing of letters in search for target features. However, since the RH advantage hypothesis could not be reliably rejected these results might indicate a complex interplay between both hemispheres. This interplay would exploit the abilities of either hemisphere during the demanding processing of rapidly presented letters, both the LH advantage in letter processing and the RH advantage in visual perception at initial stages.

Highlights

  • The human visual system is faced with multiple dynamically changing sources of stimulation that compete for attention (Desimone and Duncan, 1995)

  • In the two-stream condition (Figure 2A), visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were evoked earlier at PO8 than PO7 by 7 ms on average (t13 = −2.2, p = 0.04). This left hemisphere (LH) lag was reduced to nonsignificance in the one-stream conditions when comparing PO8, contralateral to the left stream, with PO7, contralateral to the right stream (Figure 3A), where VEPs occurred only 2 ms earlier in the right hemisphere (RH) (PO8) than in the LH (PO7) (t13 = −1.2, p = 0.26)

  • When comparing two-stream with one-stream conditions separately for either hemisphere (Figures 3B,C) RVF-VEPs at PO7 (LH) were evoked later in the two-stream than in the one-stream condition whereas the same effect was not significant for LVF-VEPs evoked at PO8 (RH)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The human visual system is faced with multiple dynamically changing sources of stimulation that compete for attention (Desimone and Duncan, 1995). Both streams must be constantly monitored in search for targets In this situation, we have observed a rightleft asymmetry of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) evoked by the standard stimuli from trial-beginning onwards before any targets were presented: These VEPs, consisting of a sequence of positive– negative peaks (P1 and N1 components) evoked by the sequence of stimuli, appeared slightly earlier over the right hemisphere (RH) than over the left one (LH) (Verleger et al, 2011, 2013; Asanowicz et al, 2017). Asymmetries of N1 amplitudes between hemispheres have been reported for faces (larger at RH) and words (larger at LH), e.g., by Rossion et al (2003), but asymmetry of latencies have been much less studied and if so for unilaterally presented stimuli (Proverbio et al, 2012; Hausmann et al, 2013) whereas stimuli have been presented bilaterally in the present task

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call