Abstract

The velocity of left atrium appendage (LAA) wall motion during atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potential marker of mechanical remodelling. In this study, we investigated whether the velocity of LAA wall motion during AF predicted the success of electrical cardioversion and long-term sinus rhythm maintenance. Standard echocardiographic data were obtained by transthoracic echocardiography, and LAA wall motion velocities were measured by transoesophageal echocardiography. With logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, we related echocardiographic and clinical data to cardioversion outcomes and sinus rhythm maintenance at 12 months. Of 121 patients prospectively included in the study, electrical cardioversion restored sinus rhythm in 97 (81.2%), and 51 (42%) patients maintained sinus rhythm at 12 months. Patients in whom cardioversion restored sinus rhythm had higher LAA wall motion velocities than did the patients with failed cardioversions (p <0.001). Compared to patients with AF at 12 months, patients who maintained sinus rhythm had lower maximum and end-diastolic left atrial volumes (p ≤ 0.01), lower E/e’ ratios (p = 0.005), higher s’ values (p = 0.013), and higher LAA motion velocities (p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression, only LAA wall motion velocity and E/e’ ratios remained significant predictors of sinus rhythm maintenance at 12 months (p ≤ 0.04). LAA wall motion velocity was also a significant predictor of sinus rhythm maintenance when corrected for clinical variables (p = 0.039). Conclusion: LAA wall motion velocity, as a marker of mechanical remodelling, can predict short-term and long-term sinus rhythm maintenance after electrical cardioversion in AF.

Highlights

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia.[1]

  • We found that left atrium appendage (LAA) wall motion was a significant predictor of successful electrical cardioversion and long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with AF

  • Atrial fibrosis is an important substrate of mechanical remodelling because it decreases contractility, leads to atrial enlargement, and increases the recurrence risk of AF.[30]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia.[1] Depending on its symptoms, AF is managed with restoration of sinus rhythm (rhythm control) or maintenance of heart rate (rate control).[2] Sinus rhythm can be effectively restored by pharmacological or electrical cardioversion. Changes in atrial structure or function, referred to as atrial remodelling, may increase the risk of recurrence or persistence of AF. There are three main types of atrial tissue remodelling: electrical, structural, and mechanical. Atrial remodelling has an important place in the pathophysiology of supraventricular arrhythmias, including AF, and other heart diseases such as mitral valve defects, heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and channelopathies. Many investigators are looking for imaging and laboratory markers of atrial remodelling that could help assess the clinical progression of atrial cardiomyopathies.[4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call