Abstract

IntroductionSurgical ablation is a generally established treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery. Left atrial (LA) lesion set for ablation is a simplified procedure suggested to reduce the surgery time and morbidity after procedure. The present meta-analysis aims to explore the outcomes of left atrial lesion set versus no ablative treatment in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery.MethodsA literature research was performed in six database from their inception to July 2017, identifying all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing left atrial lesion set versus no ablative treatment in AF patient undergoing cardiac surgery. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined clinical endpoints.ResultsEleven relevant RCTs were included for analysis in the present study. The prevalence of sinus rhythm in ablation group was significantly higher at discharge, 6-month and 1-year follow-up period. The morbidity including 30 day mortality, late all-cause mortality, reoperation for bleeding, permanent pacemaker implantation and neurological events were of no significant difference between two groups.ConclusionsThe result of our meta-analysis demonstrates that left atrial lesion set is an effective and safe surgical ablation strategy for AF patients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery.

Highlights

  • MethodsA literature research was performed in six database from their inception to July 2017, identifying all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing left atrial lesion set versus no ablative treatment in Atrial fibrillation (AF) patient undergoing cardiac surgery

  • Surgical ablation is a generally established treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery

  • A literature research was performed in six database from their inception to July 2017, identifying all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing left atrial lesion set versus no ablative treatment in Atrial fibrillation (AF) patient undergoing cardiac surgery

Read more

Summary

Methods

A literature research was performed in six database from their inception to July 2017, identifying all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing left atrial lesion set versus no ablative treatment in AF patient undergoing cardiac surgery. Electronic searches were performed using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Database of Abstracts of Review of Effectiveness (DARE) and ACP Journal Club from their date of inception to July 2017. The reference lists of all retrieved articles were checked for further identification of extra relevant studies assessed using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria for the present systematic review and meta-analysis were as follows: 1. 2. Patients underwent any cardiac surgery concomitantly with surgical ablative treatment of atrial fibrillation. 3. All patients were diagnosed with permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call