Left atrial appendage closure to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Key Findings▪Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion has emerged as an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulants in selected patients with atrial fibrillation.▪The landmark trials comparing LAA occlusion to an oral anticoagulation strategy enrolled patients with no apparent contraindications to the use of warfarin.▪LAA occlusion has limited head-to-head comparison against the direct-acting oral anticoagulants.▪Observational data to date have generally shown specific adverse events after LAA occlusion in specific subgroups of patients (women, patients with kidney disease and heart failure, patients belonging to racial/ethnic subgroups and with advanced age), but further large-scale studies are necessary to elucidate reasons for increased adverse events associated with LAA occlusion in these subgroups of patients before recommending this modality as first-line therapy in all patient groups. ▪Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion has emerged as an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulants in selected patients with atrial fibrillation.▪The landmark trials comparing LAA occlusion to an oral anticoagulation strategy enrolled patients with no apparent contraindications to the use of warfarin.▪LAA occlusion has limited head-to-head comparison against the direct-acting oral anticoagulants.▪Observational data to date have generally shown specific adverse events after LAA occlusion in specific subgroups of patients (women, patients with kidney disease and heart failure, patients belonging to racial/ethnic subgroups and with advanced age), but further large-scale studies are necessary to elucidate reasons for increased adverse events associated with LAA occlusion in these subgroups of patients before recommending this modality as first-line therapy in all patient groups.

Pulmonary Artery Perforation by Plug Anchoring System After Percutaneous Closure of Left Appendage

Malignant left atrial appendage morphology and embolization risk in atrial fibrillation

POSTER PRESENTATIONS

ORAL PRESENTATION

Comparison of Transesophageal Echocardiography Versus Computed Tomography for Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Filling Defect (Thrombus)

Contemporary left atrial appendage management during adult cardiac surgery

Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic identification of embolic risk markers in patients with lone versus non–lone atrial fibrillation

REFER TO THE PAGE 211-218 Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and strongly associated with ischemic stroke.1) In patients with AF, the main site of thrombus formation is the left atrial appendage (LAA).2) Autopsy and surgical data have suggested that about 90% of atrial thrombi in AF patients originate from the LAA.3) There are two reasonable ways to prevent ischemic stroke events in patients with AF. The first is maintenance of anticoagulation. The second is to isolate the LAA as a major embolic source from the systemic circulation. Multiple randomized, controlled trials have suggested that oral anticoagulation (OAC) decrease the risk of stroke in patients with AF.4) However, long-term OAC is contraindicated in 14% to 44% of AF patients with risk of stroke.5) Because there are various barriers against maintenance of long-term OAC such as the risk of bleeding, inconvenience of dose adjustments, drug interactions, and restrictions on diet.6) Other novel anticoagulants are also limited by the side effects, and the risk of bleeding from systemic administration of these agents.7) Because the LAA is a separate anatomic structure, it may be relatively easily isolated from systemic circulation by excision or ligation. Recently, less invasive technique using percutaneous transcatheter have been introduced for LAA isolation by occlusion of this anatomical structure with implantable devices.8) The PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) trial was planned to determine whether systemic anticoagulation with warfarin, the most commonly used anticoagulant, could be replaced by LAA closure with a percutaneously positioned device. This final results of the PROTECT AF trial followed up for an accumulated exposure of 1588 patient-years revealed LAA closure with the Watchman device to be non-inferior to systemic anticoagulation with warfarin regarding prevention of stroke, systemic embolism, and cardiovascular death.9) On the basis of these data, LAA closure has been decided a class IIb recommendation in the 2014 ACC/ASA guideline as an alternative strategy to prevent stroke. For this procedure to be accepted as an alternative, there must be a high success rate. Although success rate of the LAA closure is generally high, peri-device leakage of LAA persists due to incomplete closure.9),10) During percutaneous LAA closure for stroke prophylaxis, the geometric variability of the LAA ostium may result in an incomplete seal of the LAA. To understand the technical limitations of LAA closure, it is important to consider the anatomical variations of the LA and LAA geometry. The geometry of LA and LAA, a detailed knowledge of its anatomical characteristics and relationship might be very useful when planning the procedure. As LA and LAA geometry is complex, there are limited available data about the predictors of successful procedure. The anatomical relationship of LAA and interatrial septum (IAS) may affects the success rate of device implantation.11) In this issue, Chung et al.12) introduced 3-dimensional anatomical relation of IAS and LAA orifice as a predictor of peri-device leakage after LAA closure. One of the novel and interesting aspects of this study is that they use new novel analysis program for accurate measurement of 3-dimensional relationship between IAS and LAA orifice and found that 3-dimensional angulation between IAS and LAA significantly associated with development of peri-device leakage after LAA occlusion. In this study, the angle between the IAS plane and the line linking the LAA orifice midline and foramen ovale was measured using 3-dimensional geometric cardiac CT analysis. Measurement of this new parameter can provide more detail geometric information and predict success of the procedure. In addition, it might be helpful to select catheter and to decide the direction of IAS puncture site. This study is the first study that anatomical relationship of IAS and LAA orifice might affect peri-device leakage. However, clinical implication of peri-device leakage after LAA occlusion is unclear. Despite some previous studies suggested that the incomplete LAA occlusion was not associated with cardioembolic stroke event,10) understanding the clinical impact of peri-device leakage would be critical. As the authors commented in the limitation, larger sample size, prospective and long-term follow up data are needed to determine the clinical implication of peri-device leak after LAA occlusion. Despite some limitations, this study results suggested that novel anatomical parameter could be measured by their new software and this parameter is useful to predict peri-device leakage after LAA device closure.

Advances in Neurocardiology: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation.

The New Canadian Cardiovascular Society Algorithm for Antithrombotic Therapy of Atrial Fibrillation Is Appropriately Based on Current Epidemiologic Data

Atrial Fibrillation and Thromboembolism

To find out the most successful surgical technique to obliterate left atrial appendage (LAA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who had undergone concomitant cardiac surgery. About 10%-65% of patients develop AF following cardiac surgery [Rho 2009; Mathew 2004; Maesen 2012]. Cerebral cardio-embolic stroke remains the most serious complication in AF patients. LAA is the main anatomical source for thromboembolic events. The use of oral anticoagulants (OAG) is considered to be an effective method for reduction of thromboembolic complications [Johnson 2000]. The use of oral anticoagulants is faced by two important facts which are the therapy duration is still unknown [Kirchhof 2017] and importantly that between 30-50% of patients are not candidates for oral anticoagulants due to the high bleeding risk or other contraindications [Johnson 2000; Kirchhof 2017; Kirchhof 2014]. In such patients, LAA obliteration would be an optimal alternative technique as it will reduce the stroke risk by 50% [Go 2014]. Several surgical techniques with variable degrees of success rates have been used. It still is unclear which surgical technique is optimum to achieve a successful obliteration of the LAA and a considerable reduction of the postoperative stroke events in AF patients. A total of 100 patients have been subjected to surgical LAA exclusion from April 2017 to April 2019 in two different centers. All patients had postoperative transesophageal echo (TEE) examination to confirm the success of LAA occlusion. All patients included in our study suffered from AF at the time of surgery or in past history, which was confirmed by ECG examination in their previous medical files. A variety of surgical techniques to close the LAA have been utilized, including surgical excision by means of scissors, patch exclusion by means of an endocardial patch, suture exclusion and finally stapler exclusion. TEE examination 16 months postoperatively divided our patients into four groups as follows: successful LAA occlusion, Patent LAA, excluded LAA with persistent flow into LAA, and remnant LAA with a stump connection with LAA more than 1 cm. Out of 100 patients, 30 patients (30%) underwent surgical LAA excision, 24 patients (24%) underwent surgical epicardial suture ligation, eight patients (8%) underwent patch exclusion using autologous pericardial patch, 33 patients (33%) underwent LAA internal orifice purse string suture obliteration, and five patients (5%) underwent stapler exclusion. Forty-two patients out of 100 (42%) showed successful LAA closure. The successful LAA occlusion occurred mostly in LAA excision patients 87%, 24% in LAA internal orifice purse string suture obliteration patients, 21% in epicardial suture ligation patients, and 37.5% in patch exclusion patients. The stapler exclusion was very disappointing as we did not record a single case out of the five patients who showed a successful LAA occlusion. Stroke events were recorded in all surgical techniques except the LAA excision technique. The stroke rate after two years follow up was zero in the surgical excision group, 49% in the suture exclusion group, 20% in the patch exclusion group, and 40% in stapler exclusion group. Surgical LAA excision is the most successful technique for LAA occlusion and represents a promising technique for the reduction of thromboembolic events in AF patients who undergo a concomitant cardiac surgery.

This document is a compilation of the current American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association (ACCF/AHA) practice guideline recommendations for atrial fibrillation (AF) from the “ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation),”* the “2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update on the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (Updating the 2006 Guideline)”† and the “2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update on the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (Update on Dabigatran).”‡ Updated and new recommendations from 2011 are noted and outdated recommendations have been removed. No new evidence was reviewed, and no recommendations included herein are original to this document. The ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines chooses to republish the recommendations in this format to provide the complete set of practice guideline recommendations in a single resource. ### 1.1. Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Therapeutic Options #### 1.1.1. Rate Control During AF Class I 1. Measurement of the heart rate at rest and control of the rate using …

BACKGROUNDTanscatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure and minimally invasive thoracoscopic LAA occlusion are local interventions of LAA for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, the safety and efficacy of these methods have not been compared. This prospective cohort study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of those two treatment approaches for stroke prevention in NVAF patients.METHODSTwo hundred and nine recurrent NVAF patients who received radiofrequency ablation were enrolled. These patients were treated with transcatheter LAA closure or thoracoscopic LAA occlusion. The patients were followed up from the first postoperative day and evaluated for efficacy endpoints (stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), systemic embolism (SE), and death) and a safety endpoint (bleeding events). Perioperative complications were recorded.RESULTSAfter a median follow-up of 1.8 years (383 patient-years), the overall rate of the composite efficacy endpoints was similar between the two groups (3.8 vs. 2.7 events per 100 patient-years; HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.225−2.237; P = 0.559). However, regarding primary safety endpoint, there were 1.5 bleeding events per 100 patient-years in the thoracoscopic LAA occlusion group, compared with 6.4 in transcatheter LAA closure group (HR = 0.246; 95% CI: 0.074−0.819; P = 0.022). The incidence of operative complications was 3/138 (2.17%) in thoracoscopic LAA occlusion group and 1/71 (1.41%) in transcatheter LAA closure group. CONCLUSIONSThoracoscopic LAA occlusion and transcatheter LAA closure have similar efficacy in preventing stroke in NVAF patients. However, the thoracoscopic group had fewer bleeding events than the transcatheter group, but the former group required a longer hospital stay.