Abstract

The selection of appropriate approach(es) to teaching literature in EFL classrooms becomes a necessity that they can result in good performance of the students, both in their critical thinking aspect and their language proficiency. The problem appears when the lecturer does not implement a suitable approach to literary analysis when teaching literature to the EFL students. These problems led to the student’s inability to perform as expected. The present study examines how lecturers perceive the implementation of approaches to teaching literature in EFL classrooms and their relations to improving the students’ reflective writing skills as the manifestation of the student’ responses to the literary works. Among the approaches studied were the Language-based approach, the Reader-Response approach, and the Philosophical approach. The study was carried out on six lecturers teaching the Literary Criticism course in the EFL classrooms at the university level. A questionnaire was distributed to the lecturers teaching this course at a university in Semarang, Indonesia, containing eight-question items regarding how they perceive the literary approaches and how effective they used them in improving the students’ reflective writing skills, in encouraging the students to think critically about the events in literary works and in relating the readings to some aspects of their own lives. The study revealed that each literary analysis approach in teaching literature has its benefits and characteristics. The study results also showed that each approach has its strengths and weaknesses that differ from one another.

Highlights

  • Among the controversies concerning the importance of using literature in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms is that some experts believed literature in language classrooms plays an essential role in teaching and learning the English language to EFL students

  • L1 implemented the Response Approach (RRA) to teaching literature, L2 and L3 lecturers implemented the Language-based Approach (LBA), L4, and L5 combined more than one approach to teaching literature, and L6 only implemented the Philosophical Approach (PA) to teaching literature

  • Febriani et al (2020) believed that by using the Reader-Response approach, the students of literature class were capable of expressing more than only their personal feelings, but they began to give critical thinking upon the given literary texts

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Among the controversies concerning the importance of using literature in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms is that some experts believed literature in language classrooms plays an essential role in teaching and learning the English language to EFL students. Aghagolzadeh and Tajabadi (2012) synthesized some benefits of using literature in language classrooms. Aghagolzadeh and Tajabadi (2012) synthesized some benefits of using literature in language classrooms. They summed up that literature could provide the medium for language skills (reading, writing, listening, and speaking) to improve. The importance of teaching literature in the language classrooms covered literature as language enrichment, literature as valuable, authentic materials, literature as personal involvement, and literature as cultural enrichment. A previous study emphasized the authentic materials provided by literature as a valuable source for learning the language since they present the reality of language (Daskalovska & Dimova, 2012). Literature employed language activities that were important for advanced language learners to be exposed to a wide variety of literary texts, which eventually exposed them to cultural enrichment and personal involvement

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call