Abstract
AbstractIn this paper, we look at the relationship between European identification and political support for (or opposition to) EU membership. First, we argue that conceptualizing political attitudes towards the EU as a direct product of European identification (a) neglects the distinction between the social reality of Europe and the political reality of the EU and (b) leads to psychological reductionism. We propose that the relationship should instead be conceptualized as mediated by legitimacy perceptions and as moderated by social‐level variables. Second, we look at three spheres of European integration and propose that their perceived legitimacy is appraised through the following principles: (a) normative solidarity for wealth sharing, (b) political authority for sharing political decisions, and (c) collective self‐realization for the sharing of practices. We illustrate the key mediating role of those principles by drawing on data from a survey ran across five European countries. Third, we argue that these meditational relationships are in turn moderated by social, political, and ideological realities and illustrate this point by looking at the case of United Kingdom in the context of the EU membership referendum. We point to an ideological assumption in the U.K. political landscape about the illegitimacy of EU supranational decision making and argue that this contributed to shape both the debate of the referendum campaign and its result.
Highlights
Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) was initially proposed to account for specific phenomena such as intergroup discrimination (Turner, 1975), and with the explicit meta-theoretical goal of providing an alternative framework to dominant individualistic social psychological theories of the time
We argue that the conceptual tools offered by the social identity tradition can only be commensurate to the task if they lead to a consideration of the interaction between social-level and psychological variables in predicting attitudinal outcomes
We propose that the perceived legitimacy of EU integration reflects the extent to which the EU is seen as contributing or not to the actualization or enactment of European identity within shared practices
Summary
Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) was initially proposed to account for specific phenomena such as intergroup discrimination (Turner, 1975), and with the explicit meta-theoretical goal of providing an alternative framework to dominant individualistic (and sociologistic) social psychological theories of the time. The issue of the relationship between European identification and political attitudes to the EU can be taken as a case in point.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.