Abstract

Surface roughness is a significant factor in determining the product quality and highly impacts the production price. The ability to predict the surface roughness before production would save the time and resources of the process. This research investigated the performance of state-of-the-art machine learning and quantum behaved evolutionary computation methods in predicting the surface roughness of aluminum material in a face-milling machine. Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) and least squares gradient boosting ensemble (LSBoost) were utilized to simulate numerous face milling experiments and have predicted the surface roughness values with high extent of accuracy. The algorithms have shown a superior prediction performance over genetics optimization algorithm (GA) and the classical particle swarm optimization (PSO) in terms of statistical performance indicators. The QPSO outperformed all the simulated algorithms with a root mean square error of RMSE = 2.17% and a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.95 that closely matches the actual surface roughness experimental values.

Highlights

  • Machining is the most significant features of any production action

  • The Quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) algorithm was executed in the MATLAB software package, to optimize the machining time for a desired surface roughness of aluminum material in the millingmachine system introduced previously

  • The simulation parameters used in Matlab for the particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetics optimization algorithm (GA) algorithms are presented in Tables 4 and 5, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Machining is the most significant features of any production action. Involving several machining procedures, milling is broadly utilized procedure to create compound geometries in several applications of dies as well as molds, turbine rotors, etc. [1]. Surface roughness of any machining procedure has become essential due to the increased quality demands, and still there are probabilities of refusing the element for the absence of essential surface finish, even if the component’s dimensions are good in the dimensional tolerance It is a significant measure of the product’s quality along with significantly effects the production price and mostly dependent on numerous parameters for example cutting speed, tool nomenclature, feed, cutting force, inflexibility and depth of cut of the machine [2]. The conventional method in choosing the machining parameters is based on trial and error and the expert knowledge using the machining handbooks This method is time consuming and has an exhausting procedure. The preferred parameters are conventional, as well as away from optimum

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call