Abstract

ABSTRACT Museums house and display many authentic artifacts and objects. These objects not only draw visitors but can act as boundary objects that bridge between the worlds of scientists and the public. We observed how museum educators leveraged boundary objects in service of knowledge brokering as part of leading four educational programs at a paleontology museum. Specifically, we examined how museum educators used different forms of talk (conceptual, connecting, perceptual) with different types of boundary objects (authentic, educational, disciplinary) in knowledge brokering. The findings show how different patterns and combinations of talk and objects could support knowledge brokering or occasionally lead to failed knowledge brokering. We also discuss how museum educators must often engage in re-brokering as new discoveries are made and disciplinary knowledge evolves.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.