Abstract

We interrogated a students as partners (SaP), co-curricular program that focuses on supporting student learning. To center power and equity in SaP, the program was grounded in social design-based experiment methodology. We considered the manifestation of power and equity beyond higher education, to that of broader socio-political contexts. Collaborative autoethnography (CAE) was used to garner a richer understanding of student-staff experiences of the program. Through CAE, power emerged as central to our collective experiences, and a recognition that power asymmetry in students as partners programs is complex and multi-layered. We found that to address power imbalances in these programs requires considered strategies and intentional designs. Further, CAE, in and of itself, can be a powerful way to foster self-awareness, mutual trust, respect, and the acknowledgement of others in student-staff partnerships. We conclude by recommending the importance of deliberate design for equity and power towards consequential learning and transformational change.

Highlights

  • IntroductionStudent-staff partnerships have garnered interest in higher education

  • Over the last decade, student-staff partnerships have garnered interest in higher education

  • Our commitment to understanding students’ experiences in students as partners” (SaP) as underpinned by social design-based experiments (SDBE) reveals a number of implications

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Student-staff partnerships have garnered interest in higher education. An underpinning value of this partnership approach is honoring the student voice as means to authentically progress educational research and practice; an endeavor rooted in democratic, civic citizenship, and social justice principles since the 1990s (CookSather, 2018). This axiology has emerged through evolving definition and practice of the ways in which students participate to inform educational planning and progress. Students are positioned as more active collaborators in learning and teaching processes and practices. We posit that student-staff partnerships must be equity-centered for consequential learning and transformational change. We employed collaborative autoethnography (CAE) among a subset of staff and student partners within the wider SaP program

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call