Abstract

BackgroundCrime, traffic accidents, terrorist attacks, and other space-time random events are unevenly distributed in space and time. In the case of crime, hotspot and other proactive policing programs aim to focus limited resources at the highest risk crime and social harm hotspots in a city. A crucial step in the implementation of these strategies is the construction of scoring models used to rank spatial hotspots. While these methods are evaluated by area normalized Recall@k (called the predictive accuracy index), models are typically trained via maximum likelihood or rules of thumb that may not prioritize model accuracy in the top k hotspots. Furthermore, current algorithms are defined on fixed grids that fail to capture risk patterns occurring in neighborhoods and on road networks with complex geometries.ResultsWe introduce CrimeRank, a learning to rank boosting algorithm for determining a crime hotspot map that directly optimizes the percentage of crime captured by the top ranked hotspots. The method employs a floating grid combined with a greedy hotspot selection algorithm for accurately capturing spatial risk in complex geometries. We illustrate the performance using crime and traffic incident data provided by the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department, IED attacks in Iraq, and data from the 2017 NIJ Real-time crime forecasting challenge.ConclusionOur learning to rank strategy was the top performing solution (PAI metric) in the 2017 challenge. We show that CrimeRank achieves even greater gains when the competition rules are relaxed by removing the constraint that grid cells be a regular tessellation.

Highlights

  • Related work Real-time spatiotemporal crime forecasting has become a focal point of public and private sector development, with a desired end-state of crime reduction coupled with police efficiency (Perry 2013)

  • In more extreme security settings space-time point process models for event prediction have been applied to conflict (Zammit-Mangion et al 2012) and terrorism (Gao et al 2013) datasets and log-Gaussian Cox Processes (LGCP) have been combined with selfexciting point processes to predict crime and terrorism (Mohler 2013)

  • The outline of the paper is as follows: in “Methods” section we provide details on the CrimeRank algorithm and in “Results and discussion” section we include results for the CrimeRank algorithm on several data sets including crime and traffic incidents in Indianapolis, Improvised Explosive Device (IED) attacks in Baghdad, and data from Portland, Oregon used in the 2017 National Institute of Justice (NIJ) Real-time crime forecasting challenge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Related work Real-time spatiotemporal crime forecasting has become a focal point of public and private sector development, with a desired end-state of crime reduction coupled with police efficiency (Perry 2013). Mohler et al Crime Sci (2020) 9:3 Despite these two empirical facts, there is much less consensus regarding the most appropriate, and most efficient, methods to estimate crime concentration and evaluate crime prediction methods. This is especially true when considering the array of event types for which police have responsibility and the variability that exists across event frequency and geographic units of analysis (Mohler et al 2019). While all existing metrics of geospatial crime concentration suffer drawbacks related to their stability over different space-time units, populations, or crime rates (Curiel 2019), forecast evaluation using concentration metrics is still a valid approach to assess the potential impact police interventions can have. Current algorithms are defined on fixed grids that fail to capture risk patterns occurring in neighborhoods and on road networks with complex geometries

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call