Abstract

Distinguishing between prompt muons produced in heavy boson decay and muons produced in association with heavy-flavor jet production is an important task in analysis of collider physics data. We explore whether there is information available in calorimeter deposits that is not captured by the standard approach of isolation cones. We find that convolutional networks and particle-flow networks accessing the calorimeter cells surpass the performance of isolation cones, suggesting that the radial energy distribution and the angular structure of the calorimeter deposits surrounding the muon contain unused discrimination power. We assemble a small set of high-level observables which summarize the calorimeter information and close the performance gap with networks which analyze the calorimeter cells directly. These observables are theoretically well-defined and can be studied with collider data.

Highlights

  • 0.00 10Muon 1T1ransve1r2se Mo1m3 entum14[GeV]15 (a) (b)Average Energy (GeV)(a) Mean Prompt Muon (b) Mean Non-prompt Muon of the calorimeter

  • Distinguishing between prompt muons produced in heavy boson decay and muons produced in association with heavy-flavor jet production is an important task in analysis of collider physics data

  • We explore whether there is information available in calorimeter deposits that is not captured by the standard approach of isolation cones

Read more

Summary

Introduction

(a) Mean Prompt Muon (b) Mean Non-prompt Muon of the calorimeter. This work focuses on examining the relative power of different techniques, rather than identifying the best performance under the most realistic scenario. We apply several strategies to the task of classifying prompt and non-prompt muons, using both low-level calorimeter information and higher-level isolation quantities. The uncertainty for the AUC is calculated by training 100 randomly initialized models with the same hyperparameters on different bootstraps of the data. In this case, we seek to determine the statistical uncertainty due to the stochastic training method, rather than any systematic uncertainty due to the calorimeter resolution

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call