Abstract

BackgroundMedical knowledge encompasses both conceptual (facts or “what” information) and procedural knowledge (“how” and “why” information). Conceptual knowledge is known to be an essential prerequisite for clinical problem solving. Primarily, medical students learn from textbooks and often struggle with the process of applying their conceptual knowledge to clinical problems. Recent studies address the question of how to foster the acquisition of procedural knowledge and its application in medical education. However, little is known about the factors which predict performance in procedural knowledge tasks. Which additional factors of the learner predict performance in procedural knowledge?MethodsDomain specific conceptual knowledge (facts) in clinical nephrology was provided to 80 medical students (3rd to 5th year) using electronic flashcards in a laboratory setting. Learner characteristics were obtained by questionnaires. Procedural knowledge in clinical nephrology was assessed by key feature problems (KFP) and problem solving tasks (PST) reflecting strategic and conditional knowledge, respectively.ResultsResults in procedural knowledge tests (KFP and PST) correlated significantly with each other. In univariate analysis, performance in procedural knowledge (sum of KFP+PST) was significantly correlated with the results in (1) the conceptual knowledge test (CKT), (2) the intended future career as hospital based doctor, (3) the duration of clinical clerkships, and (4) the results in the written German National Medical Examination Part I on preclinical subjects (NME-I). After multiple regression analysis only clinical clerkship experience and NME-I performance remained independent influencing factors.ConclusionsPerformance in procedural knowledge tests seems independent from the degree of domain specific conceptual knowledge above a certain level. Procedural knowledge may be fostered by clinical experience. More attention should be paid to the interplay of individual clinical clerkship experiences and structured teaching of procedural knowledge and its assessment in medical education curricula.

Highlights

  • IntroductionMedical knowledge encompasses both conceptual (facts or “what” information) and procedural knowledge (“how” and “why” information)

  • Medical knowledge encompasses both conceptual and procedural knowledge (“how” and “why” information)

  • Achievement in key feature problems (KFP) and problemsolving tasks (PST) for the assessment of procedural knowledge In contrast to conceptual knowledge test (CKT), the participants struggled with procedural knowledge tasks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Medical knowledge encompasses both conceptual (facts or “what” information) and procedural knowledge (“how” and “why” information). Medical students learn from textbooks and often struggle with the process of applying their conceptual knowledge to clinical problems. Little is known about the factors which predict performance in procedural knowledge tasks. Which additional factors of the learner predict performance in procedural knowledge?. One of the major learning objectives in medical education is the ability to solve clinical problems by application of learned knowledge to an individual patient case. Learners need to understand the problem to be capable of solving problems from novel categories [5]. Understanding in this context means knowledge of the domain and of its teleology [6]. Reasoning experts struggle with solving problems outside their own domains underlining the need for sufficient domain knowledge [8,9,10,11,12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.