Abstract

Numerous learning styles theories have been developed and applied in K-12 and higher education settings. The idea of learning styles, or differences in how people learn, appeals to many educators as a way of meeting their students’ individual needs. Despite decades of research showing that learning styles theory is a neuromyth, the practice continues. There is no empirical research that shows matching a student’s preferred learning style to instruction produces better learning outcomes. In fact, there is no correlation between learning style and academic performance. Instruments used to determine a learning style are self-reported and unreliable. Focusing on one learning style does students a disservice by preventing them from developing their skills in other areas. The learning styles myth continues due to deep-seated beliefs among educators, commercial enterprises, students, and parents. School administrators, teacher educators, and teachers need to focus on employing research-based approaches instead of using practices for which there is no evidence of positively impacting student learning. There are several research-based practices that more effectively meet students learning needs, such as active learning and culturally responsive teaching.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.