Abstract

There is an on-going debate in the literature on theoretical underpinnings of distance learning. Scholars consider different theoretical perspectives including but not limited to theory of independence and autonomy, theory of industrialization, and theory of interaction and communication through the lens of a traditional Learning Theory approach. There is a lack of discussion on a potential role of a newly emerging field of Learning Sciences in framing the theory of distance learning. Thus, in this paper we provide a theoretical analysis of the Learning Sciences as a new approach to understand distance learning in the era of Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Learning Sciences is an interdisciplinary field that studies teaching and learning. This emerging innovative field includes but is not limited to multiple disciplines such as cognitive science, educational psychology, anthropology, computer science, to name a few. The Learning Sciences’ major objective is to understand and design effective learning environments, including distance learning, based on the latest findings about the processes involved in human learning.

Highlights

  • The world is transitioning through unprecedented changes due to the intensive implementation of distance education caused by the global pandemic

  • Analyzing theoretical underpinnings of distance learning, scholars claim that the following approaches, namely cognitive behaviourism, social constructivism and connectivism closely influenced understanding the phenomenon of distance learning

  • Whereas cognitive-behaviorist approach attempts to explain the first generation of individualized distance learning, social-constructivism and connectivism aim at understanding learning as a socially enacted process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The world is transitioning through unprecedented changes due to the intensive implementation of distance education caused by the global pandemic. The purpose of the final “e” in the cycle – the “evaluation stage” – is to engineer ongoing diagnostic process that allows both the teacher and the student to assess whether the desired level of understanding has been attained through implementation of well-designed rubrics, observation, interviews, peer-assessment, portfolios, and inquiry-based learning products/ artifacts. This stage addresses students’ misconceptions and common mistakes. This will allow a teacher to depart from the rigid structure of a lesson and transfer the

Criteria for student success
Authentic learning is not a primary consideration
Connectivism as an Emerging Branch of Constructivism
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.