Abstract

There are two distinct classes of cells in the primary visual cortex (V1): simple cells and complex cells. One defining feature of complex cells is their spatial phase invariance; they respond strongly to oriented grating stimuli with a preferred orientation but with a wide range of spatial phases. A classical model of complete spatial phase invariance in complex cells is the energy model, in which the responses are the sum of the squared outputs of two linear spatially phase-shifted filters. However, recent experimental studies have shown that complex cells have a diverse range of spatial phase invariance and only a subset can be characterized by the energy model. While several models have been proposed to explain how complex cells could learn to be selective to orientation but invariant to spatial phase, most existing models overlook many biologically important details. We propose a biologically plausible model for complex cells that learns to pool inputs from simple cells based on the presentation of natural scene stimuli. The model is a three-layer network with rate-based neurons that describes the activities of LGN cells (layer 1), V1 simple cells (layer 2), and V1 complex cells (layer 3). The first two layers implement a recently proposed simple cell model that is biologically plausible and accounts for many experimental phenomena. The neural dynamics of the complex cells is modeled as the integration of simple cells inputs along with response normalization. Connections between LGN and simple cells are learned using Hebbian and anti-Hebbian plasticity. Connections between simple and complex cells are learned using a modified version of the Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro (BCM) rule. Our results demonstrate that the learning rule can describe a diversity of complex cells, similar to those observed experimentally.

Highlights

  • About 60 years ago, Hubel and Wiesel identified two types of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) of cat: simple cells and complex cells [1, 2]

  • Though efficient coding can learn simple cells, we found that a cascaded stage of efficient coding cannot effectively learn the receptive fields (RFs) properties of complex cells from simple cell responses

  • We propose a biologically plausible model of complex cells based on the Bienenstock, Cooper, and Munro (BCM) synaptic plasticity rule [34, 35] and show that this leads to a model of complex cells that can pool simple cells with various spatial phase preferences

Read more

Summary

Introduction

About 60 years ago, Hubel and Wiesel identified two types of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) of cat: simple cells and complex cells [1, 2] They categorized simple cells as neurons that have receptive fields (RFs) with a spatial structure consisting of distinct light (ON) and dark (OFF) regions. Complex cells exhibit significant nonlinear spatial integration While they respond strongly to moving oriented edges, they do not show the other characteristics of simple cells described above. One important property of complex cells is their spatial phase invariance; i.e., strong responses are evoked by oriented gratings with the preferred orientation, but for a wide range of spatial phases This distinguishes them from simple cells, which are selective to spatial phase. Spatial phase invariance is similar to shift invariance or position invariance, which means that the response is generally not sensitive to the relative position of the stimulus within the RF of a complex cell

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call