Abstract

Seven month old infants can learn simple repetition patterns, such as we-fo-we, and generalize the rules to sequences of new syllables, such as ga-ti-ga. However, repetition rule learning in visual sequences seems more challenging, leading some researchers to claim that this type of rule learning applies preferentially to communicative stimuli. Here we demonstrate that 9-month-old infants can learn repetition rules in sequences of non-communicative dynamic human actions. We also show that when primed with these non-adjacent repetition patterns, infants can learn non-adjacent dependencies that involve memorizing the dependencies between specific human actions—patterns that prior research has shown to be difficult for infants in the visual domain and in speech. We discuss several possible mechanisms that account for the apparent advantage stimuli involving human action sequences has over other kinds of stimuli in supporting non-adjacent dependency learning. We also discuss possible implications for theories of language acquisition.

Highlights

  • Many events that humans and other organisms experience involve temporally ordered sequences

  • We found that 9-month-old infants could learn non-adjacent dependencies (NADs) from visual human actions, if they had a brief exposure to a non-adjacent ABA repetition rule first

  • The results from Experiment 1 showed that infants can learn non-adjacent repetition rules (ABA patterns) and apply them to instances of new actions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many events that humans and other organisms experience involve temporally ordered sequences These include visual events, such as watching agents engaging in actions, and machines carrying out functions, as well as auditory events, such as hearing a sequence of words in a spoken sentence, or sounds within words, or even notes in a piece of music. In many cases, these events contain regularities in which certain elements within an event predict certain others. In the English present progressive, the copula, is, is followed by a verb with the inflection -ing, for example, .

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call