Abstract

One of the benefits of globalization is that governments have the opportunity to learn from the experiences of others. The ability to learn from others' discoveries and mistakes should improve government performance. This is the basis for the World Bank's partial transformation into a knowledge bank. However, we know little about how governments draw lessons in practice. We know that sometimes they are forced to accept unwelcome lessons, as in IMF conditionality agreements. But perhaps equally often the process of adoption is voluntary. The paper considers how Colombia developed its capital housing subsidy programme. A ready exemplar was available in Chile and the major development banks were anxious to persuade other governments to accept the Chilean model. The paper considers whether Chilean experience was imitated in Colombia, the role that was played by the development banks, and how and why internal considerations determined the final form of the programme.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.