Abstract
The cross-national exchange of ideas and experience in health care reform has, in recent years, reached epidemic proportions. Taking stock of this suggests the need for critical caution. The various participants in the process have different motives; models may be exported before they have been fully tested; information may be sought chiefly as political ammunition; and selective perception often distorts the evidence. A more helpful approach might be to concentrate on evaluating the experience of countries over time, rather than concentrating on the latest fashionable panacea, and to focus more on the process of introducing change.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
