Abstract

Land use in much of sub-Saharan Africa is dominated by legislative frameworks based on a strong colonial legacy, focusing strongly on state control and minimal devolution of management responsibilities to local communities. However, attempts to reconcile conservation and socio-economic development by increasing stakeholder engagement in community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) have been undertaken since the late 1980s. Based on a review of published literature on historical land-use trajectories, the evolution of CBNRM, and key respondent interviews with NRM experts in Ghana and Zambia, this paper asks: What lessons can be learned from CBNRM to inform integrated landscape approaches for more equitable social and ecological outcomes? The paper discusses the positive characteristics and persistent challenges arising from CBNRM initiatives in both countries. The former being, improved rights and resource access, an established institutional structure at the local level, and a conservation approach tailored to the local context. The latter include the absence of multi-scale collaboration, inadequate inclusive and equitable local participation, and limited sustainability of CBNRM initiatives beyond short-term project funding timelines. The paper argues that integrated landscape approaches can address these challenges and improve natural resource management in Ghana and Zambia. We urge landscape practitioners to consider how the lessons learned from CBNRM are being addressed in practice, as they represent both challenges and opportunities for landscape approaches to improve natural resource management.

Highlights

  • Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) aims to empower communities to sustainably manage biodiversity and natural resources through participation and decentralisation (Dressler et al 2010)

  • Based on a review of published literature on historical land-use trajectories, the evolution of community-based natural resource management (CBNRM), and key respondent interviews with NRM experts in Ghana and Zambia, this paper asks: What lessons can be learned from CBNRM to inform integrated landscape approaches for more equitable social and ecological outcomes? The paper discusses the positive characteristics and persistent challenges arising from CBNRM initiatives in both countries

  • We explore the concept of CBNRM and its ability to address socio-economic and ecological needs in Ghana and Zambia, based on an extensive literature review that uses iterative steps of the Grounded Theory Literature Review Method developed by Wolfswinkel et al (2013)

Read more

Summary

SUMMARY

Land use in much of sub-Saharan Africa is dominated by legislative frameworks based on a strong colonial legacy, focusing strongly on state control and minimal devolution of management responsibilities to local communities. The paper discusses the positive characteristics and persistent challenges arising from CBNRM initiatives in both countries The former being, improved rights and resource access, an established institutional structure at the local level, and a conservation approach tailored to the local context. Leçons tirées de la Gestion de ressources naturelles à base communautaire (CBNRM) au Ghana et en Zambie: comment parvenir à des approches intégrant le paysage. Aprender de la gestión comunitaria de los recursos naturales (GCRN) en Ghana y Zambia: lecciones sobre enfoques paisajísticos integrados. A partir de una revisión de la literatura publicada sobre las trayectorias históricas del uso de la tierra, la evolución de la GCRN y entrevistas con expertos en la GRN de Ghana y Zambia, en este artículo se pregunta: ¿Qué lecciones se pueden aprender de la GCRN para informar los enfoques paisajísticos integrados con el fin de obtener resultados sociales y ecológicos más equitativos? Se insta a los profesionales de la gestión del paisaje a que consideren cómo se están abordando en la práctica las lecciones aprendidas de la GCRN, ya que representan tanto desafíos como oportunidades para los enfoques del paisaje en cuanto a mejorar la gestión de los recursos naturales

INTRODUCTION
METHODS
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.