Abstract
In this work, we explore the role of learning dynamics and social norms in human cooperation on networks. We study the model recently introduced in [Physical Review E, 97, 042321 (2018)] that integrates the well-studied Experience Weighted Attraction learning model with some features characterizing human norm psychology, namely the set of cognitive abilities humans have evolved to deal with social norms. We provide further evidence that this extended model—that we refer to as Experience Weighted Attraction with Norm Psychology—closely reproduces cooperative patterns of behavior observed in large-scale experiments with humans. In particular, we provide additional support for the finding that, when deciding to cooperate, humans balance between the choice that returns higher payoffs with the choice in agreement with social norms. In our experiment, agents play a prisoner’s dilemma game on various network structures: (i) a static lattice where agents have a fixed position; (ii) a regular random network where agents have a fixed position; and (iii) a dynamic lattice where agents are randomly re-positioned at each game iteration. Our results show that the network structure does not affect the dynamics of cooperation, which corroborates results of prior laboratory experiments. However, the network structure does seem to affect how individuals balance between their self-interested and normative choices.
Highlights
Human cooperation is both powerful and puzzling
We have studied the Experience Weighted Attraction with Norm Psychology (EWAN) model on iterated weak Prisoner’s Dilemma games on networks using the payoffs and some network structures that have been investigated in large-scale laboratory experiments with humans [21,24]
We conducted three treatments that differ with respect to their network structure: dynamic lattice, static lattice and regular random network
Summary
Large-scale cooperation among genetically unrelated individuals makes humans unique with respect to all other animal species. Several mechanisms for the promotion of cooperation have been identified [3,4]: direct, indirect and network reciprocity; multi-level selection; kin selection; and social norms with their enforcement strategies [3,4,5,6]. These mechanisms are usually studied in the framework of game theory, a mathematical formalism used to study cooperation and strategic interactions between rational decision-makers [7]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.