Abstract

BackgroundThe effectiveness of practical surgical training is characterised by an inherent learning curve. Decisive are individual initial starting capabilities, learning speed, ideal learning plateaus, and resulting learning potentials. The quantification of learning curves requires reproducible tasks with varied levels of difficulty. The hypothesis of this study is that the use of three-dimensional (3D) vision is more advantageous than two-dimensional vision (2D) for the learning curve in laparoscopic training.MethodsForty laparoscopy novices were recruited and randomised to a 2D Group and a 3D Group. A laparoscopy box trainer with two standardised tasks was used for training of surgical tasks. Task 1 was a positioning task, while Task 2 called for laparoscopic knotting as a more complex process. Each task was repeated at least ten times. Performance time and the number of predefined errors were recorded. 2D performance after 3D training was assessed in an additional final 2D cycle undertaken by the 3D Group.ResultsThe calculated learning plateaus of both performance times and errors were lower for 3D. Independent of the vision mode the learning curves were smoother (exponential decay) and efficiency was learned faster than precision. The learning potentials varied widely depending on the corresponding initial values and learning plateaus. The final 2D performance time of the 3D-trained group was not significantly better than that of the 2D Group. The final 2D error numbers were similar for all groups.ConclusionsStereoscopic vision can speed up laparoscopic training. The 3D learning curves resulted in better precision and efficiency. The 3D-trained group did not show inferior performance in the final 2D cycle. Consequently, we encourage the training of surgical competences like suturing and knotting under 3D vision, even if it is not available in clinical routine.

Highlights

  • The effectiveness of practical surgical training is characterised by an inherent learning curve

  • To assess the hypothesis that the use of three-dimensional (3D) vision is more advantageous than two-dimensional vision (2D) for the learning curve in laparoscopic training we present a randomised comparative study in a standardised box trainer setup

  • Analysis of this study revealed learning curves (LCs) in the shape of exponential decay curves

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The effectiveness of practical surgical training is characterised by an inherent learning curve. The hypothesis of this study is that the use of three-dimensional (3D) vision is more advantageous than two-dimensional vision (2D) for the learning curve in laparoscopic training. Performance time and the number of predefined errors were recorded. 2D performance after 3D training was assessed in an additional final 2D cycle undertaken by the 3D Group. Results The calculated learning plateaus of both performance times and errors were lower for 3D. The final 2D performance time of the 3D-trained group was not significantly better than that of the 2D Group. The final 2D error numbers were similar for all groups. The 3D learning curves resulted in better precision and efficiency. The 3D-trained group did not show inferior performance in the final 2D cycle. We encourage the training of surgical competences like suturing and knotting under 3D vision, even if it is not available in clinical routine

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call