Learning Curves for Robotic Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Introduction: This study sought to identify the learning curves of console time (CT) for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). Perioperative outcomes were compared between the early group of surgeries performed early in the learning curve and the late group of surgeries performed after the learning curve. Method: Data for RDP and RPD were prospectively collected for analysis. The learning curve was assessed by cumulative sum (CUSUM). Based on CUSUM analyses, patients were divided into the early group and the late group. Result: There were 70 RDP and 61 RPD cases. It required 37 cases to overcome the learning curve for RDP and 20 cases for RPD. The median console time was significantly shorter in the late group for both RDP (112 min vs. 225 min, P < 0.001) and RPD (360 min. vs. 520 min., P < 0.001). Median blood loss was significantly less in the late group for both RDP (30 cc vs. 100 cc, P = 0.003) and RPD (100 cc vs. 200 cc, P < 0.001). No surgical mortality occurred in either group. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula rate was 22.9% for RDP (32.4% in the early group vs. 12.1% in the late group, P = 0.043), and 11.5% for RPD (0 in early group vs. 17.1% in late group, P = 0.084). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the RPD learning curve is 20 cases with prior experience of RDP and confirms the safety and feasibility of both RPD and RDP. Practice and familiarity with the robotic platform are likely to contribute to significant shortening of the learning curve in robotic pancreatic surgery, while knowledge and experience, in addition to practical skills, are also essential to minimize the potential surgical risks of RPD.