Abstract
Matching is a routinely used technique to balance covariates and thereby alleviate confounding bias in causal inference with observational data. Most of the matching literatures involve the estimating of propensity score with parametric model, which heavily depends on the model specification. In this paper, we employ machine learning and matching techniques to learn the average causal effect. By comparing a variety of machine learning methods in terms of propensity score under extensive scenarios, we find that the ensemble methods, especially generalized random forests, perform favorably with others. We apply all the methods to the data of tropical storms that occurred on the mainland of China since 1949.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica, English Series
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
