Learning-by-teaching coming into play as a reliable trick for lower GI procedures: a learning curve analysis in 13,210 operative logs including the COVID-19 era.

Abstract

After suspecting a plunge in the operative case logs in our clinic, we wanted to explore the COVID-19 impact on surgical training side of the lower gastrointestinal procedures to raise awareness of the possible cracks in the pillars of general surgery residency. Comparing the coronavirus impact to previous years starting from 2014, we examined the procedures of our residents for their roles in the operating room. We performed interrupted time-series analyses to get a sense of the magnitude and then used a new index to identify the trend of change in operator-to-first assistant rate of experience and searched for signs of learning-by-teaching motives. In total, 13,210 operative logs of residents were included; of procedures, 3483 (41%) were emergency. Both overall resident participations and learning-by-teaching dropped during first 3 months, followed by a rebound. The overall operator-to-first assistant rate of experience was 1.06 before and 0.86 after. Emergency procedures, obstruction, perforation, enterostomy closure, appendix, colon, anus and minimally invasive procedures, and COVID-19 were associated with learning-by-teaching (OR and 95% Cl were; 2.20, 1.76–2.75; 0.56, 0.36–0.85; 0.50, 0.38–0.67; 2.29, 1.44–3.63; 11.09, 8.33–14.75; 1.75, 1.32–2.32; 2.56, 2.03–3.22; 0.80, 0.65–0.99 and 1.93, 1.54–2.42, respectively) (p < 0.05). The study provided insights into a vastly underrated surgical education subject: learning-by-teaching. The training index introduced here was a valuable learning curve instrument that has the capacity of comparing different training parameters or different residency programs. The surge in learning-by-teaching after the pandemic was interpreted as a reflex, processing the teaching as a training tool.