Abstract

BackgroundNew competencies may be learned through active experience (learning by doing) or observation of others’ experience (learning by observation). Observing another person performing a complex action accelerates the observer’s acquisition of the same action, limiting the time-consuming process of learning by doing. Here, we compared learning by observation and learning by doing in individuals with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS). It is hypothesized that PWS individuals could show more difficulties with learning by observation than learning by doing because of their specific difficulty in interpreting and using social information.MethodsThe performance of 24 PWS individuals was compared with that of 28 mental age (MA)- and gender-matched typically developing (TD) children in tasks of learning a visuo-motor sequence by observation or by doing. To determine whether the performance pattern exhibited by PWS participants was specific to this population or whether it was a nonspecific intellectual disability effect, we compared the PWS performances with those of a third MA- and gender-matched group of individuals with Williams syndrome (WS).ResultsPWS individuals were severely impaired in detecting a sequence by observation, were able to detect a sequence by doing, and became as efficient as TD children in reproducing an observed sequence after a task of learning by doing. The learning pattern of PWS children was reversed compared with that of WS individuals.ConclusionsThe observational learning deficit in PWS individuals may be rooted, at least partially, in their incapacity to understand and/or use social information.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s11689-015-9102-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • New competencies may be learned through active experience or observation of others’ experience

  • Learning tasks In TE1, unlike Williams syndrome (WS) participants, Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) participants did not differ from typically developing (TD) children in detection phase (DP) errors they performed in detecting the sequence by doing (Figure 2A)

  • In comparison with TD and WS participants, PWS participants performed a number of DP errors significantly higher in OBS1 but not significantly different in OBS2 and TE2 tasks (Figure 2A), as revealed by post hoc comparisons on the second-order interaction of the threeway ANOVA (F(2, 70) = 5.13, P = 0.0083, ηP2 = 0.13)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

New competencies may be learned through active experience (learning by doing) or observation of others’ experience (learning by observation). Most reports describe PWS people as characterized by poor peer relationships, social withdrawal, and preference for solitary activities [20,21] They often display aggressive behavior and a deficitary comprehension of other’s thoughts or perspective [17,22]. While learning by doing involves direct experience, learning by observation involves social processing, with all the other variables (for example, motor and cognitive complexity) being equal Observing another person performing a complex action and solving a problem accelerates the observer’s acquisition of the same action, limits the time-consuming process of learning by trial and error, and reduces the practice needed to learn the skill [24,25]. It represents a powerful learning mechanism that may be based on social processing [26,27,28]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call