Abstract

Adaptive behavior often exploits generalizations from past experience by applying them judiciously in new situations. This requires a means of quantifying the relative importance of prior experience and current information, so they can be balanced optimally. In this study, we ask whether the brain generalizes in an optimal way. Specifically, we used Bayesian learning theory and fMRI to test whether neuronal responses reflect context-sensitive changes in ambiguity or uncertainty about experience-dependent beliefs. We found that the hippocampus expresses clear ambiguity-dependent responses that are associated with an augmented rate of learning. These findings suggest candidate neuronal systems that may be involved in aberrations of generalization, such as over-confidence.

Highlights

  • Successful behavior in new situations often requires us to apply ‘rules-of-thumb’

  • To assess the predictions of Model 1 (M1) in relation to a null model, we considered the predictions under Model 2 (M2), where subjects learn about each individual without generalization

  • We have shown that subjects learn action-reward relationships in a manner that enables them to generalize rules to new situations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acquiring and applying abstract rules from limited experience presents a fundamental computational problem [1]: in which both over- or under-generalization must be avoided [2,3,4,5,6] Despite their importance, little is known about how neuronal systems learn these rules, and how the delicate balance between past and present information is maintained. Evolutionary arguments suggest that the use of previously learned rules when generalizing to new situations increases adaptive fitness by optimizing behavior [7]. This raises the key question of whether and how generalization is optimized [8]. We drew on existing evidence that points to the hippocampus as a key structure that is implicated in learning the specifics of a new situation, when previously learned rules may not apply [9,10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.