Abstract

Background: Delays in learning skills have been extensively reported for very preterm children. However, few studies have examined academic achievement profiles in Italian preterm children as a function of their neonatal immaturity. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed that included 82 healthy Italian children born very and extremely preterm (without major neurosensory outcomes; IQ ≥85). Children were evaluated for academic and neurocognitive performances at the second cycle of primary school. Results: Healthy preterm children showed on average academic and neurocognitive profiles that did not differ according to gestational age. Impairment was seen to one or more learning domains in 14.6% of the healthy preterm children. Conclusions: Italian children born very and extremely preterm without major neurosensory damage and/or cognitive delay showed on average learning and neurocognitive profiles within the normal range, regardless of gestational age. Nevertheless, they showed higher proportions of learning impairment than a normative Italian population during their final years of primary school. Healthcare providers should be aware of this result, and long-term surveillance should be organized to promptly identify those children who are in need of therapeutic intervention.

Highlights

  • Over the last 20 years, there has been an increase in the number of children born preterm, with steadily decreasing gestational age and decreasing neonatal morbidity [1]

  • The mean z-scores for the extremely preterm (EP) and very preterm children (VP) children fell within the normal range in all of the learning tests

  • The mean z-scores for the EP and VP children fell within the normal range for children for all of the neurocognitive tests

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the last 20 years, there has been an increase in the number of children born preterm, with steadily decreasing gestational age and decreasing neonatal morbidity [1]. Even in children who are born preterm with no ‘major’ neurosensory damage (i.e., healthy preterm children), a series of problems is often observed, especially from the age of 5–6 years. These problems involve different neuropsychological processes, including language, visuoperceptive and visual-motor skills, executive functions (e.g., attention) and working memory. Results: Healthy preterm children showed on average academic and neurocognitive profiles that did not differ according to gestational age. Conclusions: Italian children born very and extremely preterm without major neurosensory damage and/or cognitive delay showed on average learning and neurocognitive profiles within the normal range, regardless of gestational age

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call