Abstract
While traditional needs assessments identify educational content, generally these assessments do not measure the varied learning styles of the audience. Individual practitioners can use the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory to help identify learning styles and, based on that identification, select continuing education activities where learning will be most efficient and effective. A review of the Myers-Briggs typology and relevant literature indicates that learners with varied learning styles benefit from quite different learning activities. The traditional large continuing education meeting, for example, is well suited for some learners, not for others. Health professionals will find it easier to stay current in their fields if they select appropriate, learner-specific modes of continuing education. Professional relationships may also benefit if professionals in the same practice environment understand and appreciate that different continuing education formats are necessary for people with different learning styles.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.