Abstract
Since its invention, the microscope has been optimized for interpretation by a human observer. With the recent development of deep learning algorithms for automated image analysis, there is now a clear need to re-design the microscope's hardware for specific interpretation tasks. To increase the speed and accuracy of automated image classification, this work presents a method to co-optimize how a sample is illuminated in a microscope, along with a pipeline to automatically classify the resulting image, using a deep neural network. By adding a "physical layer" to a deep classification network, we are able to jointly optimize for specific illumination patterns that highlight the most important sample features for the particular learning task at hand, which may not be obvious under standard illumination. We demonstrate how our learned sensing approach for illumination design can automatically identify malaria-infected cells with up to 5-10% greater accuracy than standard and alternative microscope lighting designs. We show that this joint hardware-software design procedure generalizes to offer accurate diagnoses for two different blood smear types, and experimentally show how our new procedure can translate across different experimental setups while maintaining high accuracy.
Highlights
Optical microscopes remain an important instrument in both the biology lab and the clinic
We have presented a method to improve the image classification performance of a standard microscope, by adding a simple LED array and jointly optimizing its illumination pattern within an enhanced deep convolutional neural network
We achieved this joint optimization by adding what we refer to as a “physical layer” to the first components of the network, which jointly solves for weights that can be experimentally implemented in hardware
Summary
Optical microscopes remain an important instrument in both the biology lab and the clinic. Despite the widespread automation enabled by new post-processing software, the physical layout of the standard microscope has still changed relatively little - it is, for the most part, still optimized for a human viewer to peer through and inspect what is placed beneath. This paradigm presents several key limitations, an important one being that human-centered microscopes cannot simultaneously image over a large area at high resolution [7]. Biological samples are transparent, contain sub-cellular features, and can cause light to scatter, all of which limit what we can deduce from visible observations
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have