Abstract

Perceived as environmental-friendly hydraulic structures, leaky barriers used for natural flood management are introduced into rivers, potentially creating migration barriers for fish. Using sustainable, local materials to construct wooden barriers across river channels in upper catchments, these barriers aim to slow down the flow, reduce flood peaks and attenuate the flow reaching downstream communities. Yet little is known about their impact on hydrodynamics and fish passage. Here, we examined two model barrier designs under 100% and 80% bankfull flow conditions in an open channel flume. These barriers included a porous and a non-porous design, with the latter emulating the natural accumulation of brush, sediment and leaf material between logs over time. Flow visualization and velocity measurements recorded with acoustic Doppler velocimetry characterized the flow field upstream and downstream of the barriers. Our fish behavioural studies revealed that juvenile salmon (Salmo salar) movement between downstream and upstream sections of the flume was inhibited by barrier design rather than discharge, influencing upstream fish passage and their spatial preference, indicating the importance of barrier design criteria to facilitate fish movement.

Highlights

  • The introduction of artificial barriers worldwide has caused the removal, reduction, modification and fragmentation of the aquatic environment

  • Channel hydrodynamics and fish behaviour were quantified for a porous and non-porous barrier and a control situation and two flow conditions to determine the impact of flow conditions and structure on spatial preference and upstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon

  • Normalized time-averaged longitudinal velocity (u=U01) results for the main channel hydrodynamics measured for the control situation at x/b0 = 0.8 (a), and for the non-porous (b) and porous barrier (c) profiles for 100% and 80% bankfull flow conditions at the four x/b0 locations indicated in figure 3 are presented in figure 4

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The introduction of artificial barriers worldwide has caused the removal, reduction, modification and fragmentation of the aquatic environment. This has resulted in habitat loss and degradation, and presents a major threat to fish worldwide and in Europe [1,2]. In the UK, 99% of rivers are fragmented with only 1% of catchments free-flowing [3]. Lowhead structures such as weirs, sluice gates, dams, culverts and water in- and out-takes, are used to divert flows, control and (a).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call