Abstract

Despite increasing use of trait-based approaches in community ecology, most studies do not account for intraspecific variability of functional traits. Although numerous studies investigated functional traits of species with high economic value, the intraspecific and interspecific (caused by species identity) trait variability of forest understory herbs is still poorly understood. We aimed to assess the variability of specific leaf area (SLA), total leaf area, aboveground biomass and leaf mass fraction among 167 forest understory plant species, and the level of variability explained by species identity and collection site. We hypothesized that the level of intraspecific variability of SLA is underestimated in commonly used trait databases and that the interspecific variability (caused by species identity) is greater than intraspecific variability (site-specific). Our study revealed higher interspecific than intraspecific variability of the traits studied. We also confirmed that level of intraspecific variability available in the LEDA database is underestimated. We confirmed that species identity was the main factor determining the values of all the traits studied, and site-specific random effects explained lower amounts of variation in traits. Use of trait values from databases not acknowledging intraspecific variability is biased by uncertainty about this variability. For that reason, our analysis used mean trait values to reduce uncertainty of the results in the study conducted to assess human impacts on ecosystems. Thus, our study might support the assumption that level of intraspecific variability of functional traits is lower than interspecific variability.

Highlights

  • Revealing the effects of plant diversity and interspecific interactions on related ecosystem functions is a challenging task needed to guide conservation efforts and management of ecological resources (Chapin III and others 2000; Dıaz and Cabido 2001)

  • Specific leaf area of the species studied ranged from 73.96 cm2 g-1 ± standard error (SE) 1.36 (Eriophorum angustifolium), 85.51 cm2 g-1 ± SE 0.25 (Vaccinium vitisidaea) and 98.53 cm2 g-1 ± SE 2.53 (Galanthus nivalis), to 981.66 cm2 g-1 ± SE 19.55 (Impatiens noli-tangere), 981.18 cm2 g-1 ± SE 21.35 (Galium palustre) and 863.27 cm2 g-1 ± SE 2.08 (Impatiens parviflora; Figure 2)

  • Leaf mass fraction of the total aboveground biomass of the species studied ranged from 1.0 ± SE 0.00 to 0.12 ± SE 0.01 (Agrostis capillaris and Centaurium erythraea) and 0.18 ± SE 0.02 (Anthoxanthum odoratum)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Revealing the effects of plant diversity and interspecific interactions on related ecosystem functions is a challenging task needed to guide conservation efforts and management of ecological resources (Chapin III and others 2000; Dıaz and Cabido 2001). The recognition and understanding of correlations between those traits provide the ability to assess plant responses to climate change, or to estimate the possible shifts in species ranges, and their potential threats or invasiveness (Ordonez 2014; Canessa and others 2018; Wuest and others 2018). The achievement of this goal is crucial in the context of predicting the impact of global climatic change on the shape, functioning and diversity of the Earth’s ecosystems. It is important for developing countries, where funding for research is often extremely limited, but where the adverse effects of human activity on the environment are the largest (Schmidhuber and Tubiello 2007; Muller and others 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call