Abstract

Crop canopy temperature and Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) are used for assessing plant water status and irrigation scheduling, but understanding management interactions is necessary. This study evaluated whether nutrient deficiencies would confound interpretation of plant water status from leaf temperature. Leaf temperature and CWSI in maize (Zea mays L.) were evaluated with different irrigation strategies and varying nitrogen (N) supply for replicated glasshouse and field studies. Glasshouse treatments consisted of well-watered or simulated drought and sufficient, intermediate, or deficient N. Field study treatments consisted of well-watered, controlled deficit irrigation, or simulated drought and sufficient, sufficient delayed, or deficient N. Average CWSI values varied across irrigation treatments, with 0.37 and 0.54 for glasshouse well-watered and drought and 0.34, 0.47, and 0.51 for field well-watered, drought, and controlled deficit treatments, respectively. Nitrogen levels created widely different leaf chlorophyll contents without affecting leaf temperature or CWSI. Canopy water stress measurements were robust across varying N levels, but CWSI did not correlate well with leaf area due to confounding effects of irrigation timing and nitrogen levels. Leaf temperature and CWSI are useful for evaluating crop water status, but nutrient status and timing of water stress must also be considered for crop growth prediction.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call