Abstract

Plants utilize an innate immune system to protect themselves from disease. While many molecular components of plant innate immunity resemble the innate immunity of animals, plants also have evolved a number of truly unique defense mechanisms, particularly at the physiological level. Plant’s flexible developmental program allows them the unique ability to simply produce new organs as needed, affording them the ability to replace damaged organs. Here we develop a system to study pathogen-triggered leaf abscission in Arabidopsis. Cauline leaves infected with the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae abscise as part of the defense mechanism. Pseudomonas syringae lacking a functional type III secretion system fail to elicit an abscission response, suggesting that the abscission response is a novel form of immunity triggered by effectors. HAESA/HAESA-like 2, INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION, and NEVERSHED are all required for pathogen-triggered abscission to occur. Additionally phytoalexin deficient 4, enhanced disease susceptibility 1, salicylic acid induction-deficient 2, and senescence-associated gene 101 plants with mutations in genes necessary for bacterial defense and salicylic acid signaling, and NahG transgenic plants with low levels of salicylic acid fail to abscise cauline leaves normally. Bacteria that physically contact abscission zones trigger a strong abscission response; however, long-distance signals are also sent from distal infected tissue to the abscission zone, alerting the abscission zone of looming danger. We propose a threshold model regulating cauline leaf defense where minor infections are handled by limiting bacterial growth, but when an infection is deemed out of control, cauline leaves are shed. Together with previous results, our findings suggest that salicylic acid may regulate both pathogen- and drought-triggered leaf abscission.

Highlights

  • An arms race has been waged for eons between plants and microbial pathogens

  • The genetics regulating this defense mechanism are comprised of both classical defense genes and floral organ abscission genes working together

  • HAE is co-expressed with ENHANCED DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY 1 (EDS1) and PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT 4 (PAD4) in abscission zones

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An arms race has been waged for eons between plants and microbial pathogens. Plants have evolved sophisticated defense mechanisms against disease while pathogens have acquired sophisticated means of avoiding the host’s defense. Plants can scan themselves for general damage or modification caused by microbial pathogens, such as degradation of the plant cell wall that releases socalled damage-associated molecular patterns This part of the plant innate immune system is called pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) [2]. A second layer of plant immunity, effector-triggered immunity (ETI), relies on resistance proteins to detect pathogen effectors that pathogens deploy in the host cell to manipulate immune responses or release of nutrients [2,3] Most commonly, these resistance proteins either directly bind specific effectors or detect effectorinduced changes to host proteins with which they associate [1,2,3,4]. Defense studies in plants have focused largely on microbe growth suppression and containment mechanisms at the tissue level but not the organ level

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call