Abstract
The two currently available leadless pacemakers are highly effective and safe in the respective approval studies and also real-world registries. Compared to conventional pacemakers, there are lower long-term complication rates compared to conventional pacemaker systems (especially regarding lead dislocations and systemic infections). Increasing evidence (currently largely for the Micra™ [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA] device) shows that these advantages are also valid in the long-term. Leadless pacemakers can therefore be regarded a"permanently good solution", when appropriately implanted in suitable patients.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
