Abstract

Aim: The present study contributes to the conversation on remote (home) working, leadership, and innovation in times of COVID-19 by examining the mediating role of work-related flow in the relationship between empowering and directive leadership, on the one hand, and innovative work-behavior, on the other, and the moderating role of IT-enabled presence awareness in two lockdown periods during the pandemic.Method: We employed PLS-SEM analysis to analyze the perceptions, experiences, and behaviors of a group of employees (N = 257) regarding the study’s core variables during two phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (summer 2020 and autumn 2020).Results: In line with expectations, in the earlier phase of the pandemic, empowering leadership had both a positive direct and indirect relationship with innovative work-behavior via work-related flow, whereas directive leadership only had a negative direct relationship with innovative work-behavior. In the second phase, however, empowering leadership only had a positive indirect relationship with innovative work-behavior, running via work-related flow. Moreover, directive leadership was both directly and indirectly negatively related to innovative work-behavior, via work-related flow. In contrast to our expectations, IT-enabled presence awareness did not play a moderating role in these relationships in any phase.Discussion: Our findings underline the importance of empowerment in sustaining innovative work-behavior, particularly in intense and enduring remote work contexts, as this can amplify employees’ ability, motivation and opportunity to generate, share and implement novel ideas. In remote work contexts, empowering leadership can particularly foster innovation indirectly via work-related flow, which was also shown to be an increasingly important underlying mechanism across time periods. Directive leadership, in contrast, can reduce work-related flow and, therefore, hinder innovation. Our study did not find evidence for the moderating role of employees’ perceptions of IT-enabled presence awareness.Conclusion: We conclude that regardless of the IT-quality, the leadership style chosen plays an important role in innovative work-behavior in remote work-contexts, particularly in view of the divergent effects of empowering and directive leadership on work-related flow in enduring and intense remote work contexts.

Highlights

  • In compliance with the social-distancing regulations imposed by national governments to avoid the spread of the COVID-19virus, many employees continued their regular work activities while working remotely using information and communication technologies (IT)

  • In view of the gaps presented above, the present study aims to contribute to the conversation on leadership and innovation by examining the mediating role of work-related flow between empowering and directive leadership and innovative work-behavior in times of COVID-19, and the moderating role of IT-enabled presence awareness on the relationship between leadership and work-related flow

  • We found that the relationship between empowering leadership and innovative work-behavior during the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic was partly mediated through work-related flow

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In compliance with the social-distancing regulations imposed by national governments to avoid the spread of the COVID-19virus, many employees continued their regular work activities while working remotely using information and communication technologies (IT). The sudden shift toward homeworking forced many organizations to improvise and to develop new work routines to virtually serve customers and to collaborate with others inside and outside the organization. This shift demanded employees to engage in innovative work-behaviors (Janssen, 2000) to make the best of the situation and to even flourish in the rapidly changing work environment. Innovative work-behavior, may not be that easy in remote workcontexts, as employees’ reliance on technology to facilitate their collaboration increases (Gibson and Gibbs, 2006). The question, arises how leaders have responded to the new situation, as virtual working may have changed the relationships between leaders and employees, and among employees, since it is harder to control and motivate employees directly (Peters et al, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.